1
00:00:05,570 --> 00:00:02,000
the most interesting thing about this

2
00:00:07,519 --> 00:00:05,580
gimbal UFO footage is the rotation now

3
00:00:09,890 --> 00:00:07,529
I've explained before how this can just

4
00:00:11,660 --> 00:00:09,900
be a rotating glare caused by the way

5
00:00:15,890 --> 00:00:11,670
the camera is mounted on something

6
00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:15,900
called a gimbal mount no coincidence but

7
00:00:19,939 --> 00:00:18,210
if the glare is rotating independently

8
00:00:21,740 --> 00:00:19,949
at the horizon because of these camera

9
00:00:24,830 --> 00:00:21,750
movements then shouldn't we see other

10
00:00:27,380 --> 00:00:24,840
light effects also rotate in the Nimitz

11
00:00:29,419 --> 00:00:27,390
or tic-tac footage we see a fairly

12
00:00:31,310 --> 00:00:29,429
dramatic rotation of both the object

13
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:31,320
position and what looks like some

14
00:00:35,870 --> 00:00:33,450
reflected lights over the whole frame as

15
00:00:38,420 --> 00:00:35,880
the camera traverses from minus three

16
00:00:40,069 --> 00:00:38,430
degrees to plus three degrees which is

17
00:00:41,750 --> 00:00:40,079
where a different rotation mechanism is

18
00:00:44,119 --> 00:00:41,760
use and the main gimbal system does a

19
00:00:46,459 --> 00:00:44,129
large correction as I demonstrated it in

20
00:00:48,229 --> 00:00:46,469
another video that demonstrates that

21
00:00:50,180 --> 00:00:48,239
it's the camera rotating in the nimitz

22
00:00:55,250 --> 00:00:50,190
footage but can we see this in the

23
00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:55,260
gimbal video yes we can I've been using

24
00:00:59,479 --> 00:00:56,730
the version of the video that the New

25
00:01:01,010 --> 00:00:59,489
York Times put out in December 2017 and

26
00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:01,020
if you scrub back and forth with that

27
00:01:05,090 --> 00:01:02,370
you can kind of see the background

28
00:01:05,750 --> 00:01:05,100
rotates when the glare rotates that's

29
00:01:07,700 --> 00:01:05,760
evidence

30
00:01:10,670 --> 00:01:07,710
but it was never that convincing because

31
00:01:12,590 --> 00:01:10,680
of the quality of the video but today I

32
00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:12,600
discovered that the New York Times is a

33
00:01:16,010 --> 00:01:14,250
higher quality version of the video

34
00:01:19,940 --> 00:01:16,020
which they posted in May of this year

35
00:01:22,249 --> 00:01:19,950
2019 the older video was encoded at 3.8

36
00:01:25,249 --> 00:01:22,259
megabits per second for the new video

37
00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:25,259
which also includes the go-fast video is

38
00:01:29,420 --> 00:01:27,450
encoded at twelve point four megabits

39
00:01:32,359 --> 00:01:29,430
per second more than three times the

40
00:01:34,310 --> 00:01:32,369
data rate if you compare the two you can

41
00:01:36,039 --> 00:01:34,320
see there's much more detailed contrast

42
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:36,049
in the background when you zoom in

43
00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:37,890
unfortunately they darkened the lower

44
00:01:42,130 --> 00:01:39,810
portion of the video but were really

45
00:01:44,450 --> 00:01:42,140
only interested in the glare on the sky

46
00:01:45,980 --> 00:01:44,460
now when we scrub back and forth with

47
00:01:47,420 --> 00:01:45,990
this new version you can see the

48
00:01:49,789 --> 00:01:47,430
rotation of the light pattern more

49
00:01:51,770 --> 00:01:49,799
clearly but more importantly the

50
00:01:54,469 --> 00:01:51,780
increased bitrate of the video allows us

51
00:01:56,450 --> 00:01:54,479
to better enhance the contrast and see

52
00:01:58,520 --> 00:01:56,460
this rotation even clearer than before

53
00:01:59,359 --> 00:01:58,530
it might be a bit hard to see what I'm

54
00:02:02,120 --> 00:01:59,369
talking about

55
00:02:04,130 --> 00:02:02,130
what is rotating in an enclosed moving

56
00:02:05,690 --> 00:02:04,140
camera system like this you've got two

57
00:02:07,999 --> 00:02:05,700
types of light which make up the final

58
00:02:09,350 --> 00:02:08,009
image you've got The Wanted light the

59
00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:09,360
light from the scene that goes through

60
00:02:13,220 --> 00:02:11,130
the lens as you would expect and mix the

61
00:02:15,500 --> 00:02:13,230
pitcher but then this unwanted light

62
00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:15,510
glare lens flares diffraction effects

63
00:02:18,500 --> 00:02:17,970
and reflections and set it on top of the

64
00:02:21,050 --> 00:02:18,510
image

65
00:02:22,790 --> 00:02:21,060
so who rotate parts of the camera then

66
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:22,800
some of the unwanted light can also

67
00:02:27,500 --> 00:02:25,410
rotate here you see the faint band and

68
00:02:29,270 --> 00:02:27,510
regions of light and dark rotate with

69
00:02:30,470 --> 00:02:29,280
the glare in the middle and that's what

70
00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:30,480
you should look for in the gimbal

71
00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:32,370
footage this rotation of the light

72
00:02:36,980 --> 00:02:34,410
across the sky matches the rotation of

73
00:02:39,650 --> 00:02:36,990
the glare the supposed UFO which proves

74
00:02:42,050 --> 00:02:39,660
two things firstly it proves the

75
00:02:44,090 --> 00:02:42,060
rotation is caused by the camera the

76
00:02:45,710 --> 00:02:44,100
abrupt rotations of the UFO match the

77
00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:45,720
rotations of a light field in the sky

78
00:02:52,790 --> 00:02:49,370
perfectly there's a large rotation here

79
00:02:54,620 --> 00:02:52,800
then the second rotation then there's a

80
00:02:56,510 --> 00:02:54,630
jump at three to four degrees probably

81
00:02:59,300 --> 00:02:56,520
caused by the large outer gimbal

82
00:03:01,130 --> 00:02:59,310
correction secondly it proves that the

83
00:03:03,980 --> 00:03:01,140
shape of the UFO is largely if not

84
00:03:05,300 --> 00:03:03,990
entirely due to camera glare we've seen

85
00:03:07,610 --> 00:03:05,310
this type of glare before in other

86
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:07,620
videos of engine exhaust and since it

87
00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:09,450
rotates with a camera that means the

88
00:03:17,420 --> 00:03:12,090
entire effect is just a camera artifact

89
00:03:20,510 --> 00:03:17,430
is it solved nearly we still don't know

90
00:03:23,390 --> 00:03:20,520
what this is but the shape is solved the

91
00:03:27,470 --> 00:03:23,400
rotation is solved and the glow the aura

92
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:27,480
is also solved so what we are looking at

93
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:29,850
is something hot something like a jet

94
00:03:34,340 --> 00:03:32,250
engine miles away there's nothing to

95
00:03:38,900 --> 00:03:34,350
indicate any kind of advanced technology

96
00:03:42,050 --> 00:03:38,910
or aliens this all raises a question

97
00:03:44,750 --> 00:03:42,060
even New York Times and especially the

98
00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:44,760
to the Stars Academy have this higher

99
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:46,890
quality footage all the time and why

100
00:03:52,070 --> 00:03:49,530
didn't they release it why just put out